Clinical efficacy of the Romberg test using a foam pad to identify balance problems: a comparative study with the sensory organization test.

Related Articles

Clinical efficacy of the Romberg test using a foam pad to identify balance problems: a comparative study with the sensory organization test.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;272(10):2741-7

Authors: Hong SK, Park JH, Kwon SY, Kim JS, Koo JW

Abstract
The modified Romberg test using a foam pad ("MRuFP") as a bedside examination has been used to assess the function of the complex sensory input needed for upright stance. The objective of this study was to assess its clinical value detecting vestibular falls in comparison with the sensory organization test (SOT), the gold standard. In total, 80 patients who had undergone the MRuFP, SOT, and bithermal caloric tests were included in this study. The MRuFPs were performed on two (height 12 cm, MRu2FP) or three (18 cm, MRu3FP) layers of foam pads. The odds ratios of falling on SOT were calculated. Iterative algorithms were used for linear curve fitting between the balance time on the MRuFP and SOT equilibrium score (ES). The diagnostic performance of MRuFP under different conditions was poor, with low sensitivity (0.07-0.63), when the results of SOT were used as the gold standard. However, the odds ratios of failing SOT condition 5 were 6.78 (95% CI = 1.26-36.50) for patients with abnormal findings on eyes closed (EC)-MRu2FP and 10.91 (95% CI = 2.58-46.11) for those on the EC-MRu3FP in patients without caloric weakness. In patients with caloric weakness, the odds ratio of failing SOT condition 5 for patients with abnormal findings on EC-MRu2FP was 7.0 (95% CI = 0.69-70.74, p > 0.05), and 32.0 for those on EC-MRu3FP (95% CI = 2.81-364.7). A linear equation was presented as the model fit (adjusted R(2) = 0.355) predicting the SOT condition 5 ES according to the balance time on EC-MRu3FP. In conclusion, the EC-MRu3FP, as a bedside examination, correlated well with SOT condition 5 as an objective measure.

PMID: 25200890 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

from Hearing and Balance via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1q8NzDT
via IFTTT

Economic management of vertigo/dizziness disease in a county hospital: video-head-impulse test vs. caloric irrigation.

Related Articles

Economic management of vertigo/dizziness disease in a county hospital: video-head-impulse test vs. caloric irrigation.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;272(10):2621-8

Authors: Rambold HA

Abstract
The video-head-impulse test (vHIT) is an important test for examining unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Alternatively, one can test for vestibular hypofunction with the caloric irrigation test. Various studies have shown that both tests may not always identify vestibular hypofunction; instead, the results of the tests might be contradictory. This retrospective study reproduces those finding in a much larger group of patients at a county hospital. 1063 patients were examined with the vHIT and bithermal caloric irrigation on the same day and analyzed with respect to side differences. Of those patients 13.3% had pathological vHIT and a caloric irrigation test, 4.6% a pathological vHIT only and 24.1% a pathologic caloric test only. As both tests might be necessary, we calculated the optimal sequence of the two examinations based on savings in time for the different disease groups. Especially in vestibular failure using the vHIT first and only applying the caloric irrigation in case of an unremarkable vHIT saves time and optimizes the diagnostic work up. In contrast, in Menière's disease and vestibular migraine testing caloric irrigation first might be more efficient.

PMID: 25078154 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

from Hearing and Balance via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1SrjLZi
via IFTTT