Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου
-
▼
2023
(269)
-
▼
Φεβρουαρίου
(133)
-
▼
Φεβ 19
(20)
- Antitumor therapy for breast cancer: Focus on tumo...
- Biomechanical influence of narrow‐diameter implant...
- Equity in adjuvant radiotherapy utilization in loc...
- An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin p...
- Multifunctional Two-Dimensional Bi2Se3 Nanodiscs f...
- Downregulation of miR‐193a/b‐3p during HPV‐induced...
- Assessment of attenuation of varicella‐zoster viru...
- Pustular psoriasis in Malaysia: A review of the Ma...
- The prevalence and influencing factors of gag refl...
- The ability of magnetic resonance imaging to predi...
- Risk and incidence of breast cancer in transgender...
- Characterization of Hyaluronan Localization in the...
- LRRK2 Quantification in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Pat...
- Opening of mitochondrial permeability transition p...
- Frequent EGFR exon 20 insertion in the so‐called p...
- Central odontogenic fibroma with amyloid: a diagno...
- Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab Treatment and Cardiovascula...
- The Ixodes ricinus salivary gland proteome during ...
- Characterization of protein-based risk signature t...
- Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epithel...
-
▼
Φεβ 19
(20)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (136)
-
▼
Φεβρουαρίου
(133)
-
►
2022
(2046)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (165)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (161)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (165)
-
►
2021
(3028)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (135)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (182)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (324)
-
►
2020
(1051)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (292)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (60)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (28)
-
►
2019
(2277)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (18)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (54)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (89)
-
►
2018
(26280)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (189)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (6130)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (7050)
-
►
2017
(33948)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (6715)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (6470)
-
►
2016
(4179)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (638)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (526)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (517)
Τρίτη 1 Δεκεμβρίου 2015
OtoRhinoLaryngology & Medicine,New Articles,December 1st,2015
Δευτέρα 30 Νοεμβρίου 2015
Management of oral Graft versus Host Disease with topical agents: A systematic review.
Management of oral Graft versus Host Disease with topical agents: A systematic review.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Nov 30;:0
Authors: Albuquerque R, Khan Z, Poveda A, Higham J, Richards A, Monteiro L, Jané-Salas E, Lopez-Lopez J, Warnakulasuriya S
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral Graft-versus-Host Disease (oGvHD) is a common complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Choosing the right topical application to be used intra orally can be a challenge. Consequently, the aim of this work is to review the effectiveness and safety of topical agents currently used in the management of the inflammatory mucosal lesions encountered in oGVHD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out electronic searches of publications up to May 2015 of the databases Pubmed, National Library of Medicine's Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical trials to identify potentially relevant studies (keywords: "oral", "graft", "versus", "host", "disease" and "treatment"). The main inclusion criterion was the reported use of a topical agent which was not intentionally swallowed when used for the treatment of oGVHD. A 3-point grading system, described by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, was used to rate the methodological quality of the papers.
RESULTS: From the 902 entries identified in the search, 7 studies qualifying for inclusion were analysed. Overall, there is limited evidence with regards to the effectiveness of topical steroids for oGVHD. However, the studies showed some effect of Budesonide alone and when combined with dexamethasone. Topical tacrolimus also appears to have some effect and clobetasol propionate mouthwash had a significantly better clinical response than dexamethasone mouthwash in treating oGVHD.
CONCLUSIONS: As the number of clinical trials conducted is limited, there is little evidence to support the use of topical therapies to treat the inflammatory mucosal lesions found in oGVHD. High quality randomised control trials are needed in order to measure the effectiveness of any topical application for the treatment of the inflammatory mucosal lesions found in oGVHD.
PMID: 26615510 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
from #ENT-PubMed via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1PVKZLk
via IFTTT
Single dose of diclofenac or meloxicam for control of pain, facial swelling, and trismus in oral surgery.
Single dose of diclofenac or meloxicam for control of pain, facial swelling, and trismus in oral surgery.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Nov 30;:0
Authors: Orozco-Solís M, García-Ávalos Y, Pichardo-Ramírez C, Tobías-Azúa F, Zapata-Morales JR, Aragon-Martínez OH, Isiordia-Espinoza MA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain associated with removal of mandibular third molars has been documented from moderate to severe during the first 24 hours after surgery, with pain peaking between 6 and 8 hours when a conventional local anesthetic is used. Dental pain is largely inflammatory, and evidence-based medicine has shown that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the best analgesics for dental pain. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-trismus effect of a single dose of diclofenac and meloxicam after mandibular third molar extraction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients were randomized into two treatment groups, each with 18 patients, using a series of random numbers: Group A, was administered 100 mg of diclofenac; and Group B, 15 mg of meloxicam. Drugs were administered orally 1 hour prior to surgery. We evaluated pain intensity, analgesic consumption, swelling, as well as trismus.
RESULTS: The results of this study showed that patients receiving 15 mg of meloxicam had less postoperative pain (P=0.04) and better aperture than those receiving 100 mg of diclofenac (P=0.03). The meloxicam group presented less swelling than diclofenac group; however, significant statistical differences were not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Data of this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial demonstrated that patients receiving 15 mg of preoperative meloxicam had a better postoperative analgesia and anti-trismus effect compared with who were given 100 mg of diclofenac after third molar extractions.
PMID: 26615509 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
from #ENT-PubMed via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1lpxbfh
via IFTTT
