http://sfaki.blogspot.gr/2017/04/nasal-ala-reconstruction-surgical.html
Skin tumours of the nasal ala are common and surgery is the treatment
of choice. Nasal ala reconstruction is challenging due to the reduced
mobility and unique features of its thick and sebaceous skin. The
natural arc of the ala and its boundary with the cheek are difficult
features to reproduce. One should bear in mind the functional and
cosmetic risks of nasal ala reconstruction. A distorted nasal contour
may impair the nasal valve; the alar rim may notch or elevate; facial
symmetry may be disrupted by blunting of the alar crease, trapdooring,
bridging of the nasofacial sulcus and poor colour and texture match.
Our aim is to review and compare the functional and cosmetic results
of different local flaps used to correct intermediate-thickness
defects on the nasal ala after surgical excision of cutaneous tumours.
We present representative patients who were treated at our
Dermatological Surgery Unit from June 2015 to September 2016.
The choice of the flap was adapted to the patients' physiognomy and
the defects' size: tunnelled island pedicle melolabial flap [Figure
1]; jigsaw puzzle advancement flap [Figure 2]; spiral flap [Figure 3];
dog-ear island pedicle flap [Figure 4] and banner melolabial
transposition flap [Figure 5]. Surgery was performed under
loco-regional anaesthesia, in an outpatient basis, followed by
prophylactic antibiotic therapy. There were neither immediate
complications nor subsequent flap necrosis. The tumours were
completely excised.
Figure 1: Female, 86-year-old, nodular ulcerated basal cell carcinoma
in the nasal ala: tunnelled island pedicle melolabial flap. (a)
Surgical plan, (b) primary defect, (c) secondary defect after
tunnelling of the flap, (d) immediate post-operative, (e and f) result
after healing (10 months after surgery).
Click here to view
Figure 2: Male, 76-year-old, nodular basal cell carcinoma on the nasal
ala: jigsaw puzzle advancement flap. (a) surgical plan, (b) primary
and secondary defects, (c) anchoring sutures secure the flap in place;
(d) immediate post-operative, (e) result after healing (3 months after
surgery).
Click here to view
Figure 3: Female, 76-year-old, nodular basal cell carcinoma on the
nasal ala: spiral flap, a combination of advancement and rotation. (a)
Surgical plan, (b) immediate post-operative, (c) result after healing
(2 months after surgery).
Click here to view
Figure 4: Female, 76-year-old, basal cell carcinoma on the nasal ala:
dog-ear island flap, combining two flaps: cheek advancement and
rotated island pedicle. (a) Surgical plan, (b) primary defect, (c)
immediate post-operative, (d) day 7 post-operative, (e) result after
healing (1 month after surgery).
Click here to view
Figure 5: Male, 83-year-old, two nodular basal cell carcinomas on the
nasal ala and dorsum: Banner's melolabial transposition flap. (a)
Surgical plan, (b) primary defect, (c) immediate post-operative, (d)
result after healing (7 months after surgery)
Click here to view
Facial symmetry was well preserved by the spiral and jigsaw puzzle
flaps [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. The nasal sulcus was left intact by
the spiral flap as well as the tunnelled melolabial island flap
[Figure 1] and [Figure 3]. The melolabial flaps and the dog-ear island
flap allowed for the correction of larger defects on the nasal ala
[Figure 1], [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. The dog-ear island flap [Figure
4] obtained a good result despite the large size of the primary
defect. Banner's melolabial transposition flap [Figure 5] was used to
correct a complex defect involving not only the nasal ala but also the
nasal dorsum and resulted in facial asymmetry due to trapdooring.
The small size of the defects that can be addressed by the spiral and
puzzle flaps may explain their superior cosmetic results.[1],[2] The
tunnelled melolabial island flap, although technically demanding, may
produce excellent results; compared to the cheek-to-nose interpolation
flap, the tunnelling technique offers the advantage of being one-stage
procedure. The dog-ear island flap is an adaptation of the cheek
advancement flap; despite its apparent complexity, it offers a viable
alternative to the melolabial flaps,[3] with a lower risk of trapdoor
effect and with proper preservation of the alar contour. The discussed
flaps are useful alternatives to the bilobed transposition flap and
the skin graft for the surgical reconstruction of the nasal ala.
When planning the surgery, it is important to assess the primary
defect on the nasal ala: size and location (medial or lateral), depth,
involvement of other cosmetic units/subunits and extension to the alar
rim, nasal tip or adjacent cheek. Several techniques have been
developed that are useful for the reconstruction of defects of the
nasal ala. Based on our experience and a review of the literature, we
present an algorithm [Table 1] to optimise the choices in the
reconstruction of intermediate-thickness defects in nasal ala. In
[Table 2], we review the main advantages and caveats of some of the
most useful surgical techniques for nasal ala
reconstruction.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]
Table 1: Nasal ala reconstruction: What is the optimal approach
according to the defects' size and location?
Click here to view
Table 2: Nasal ala reconstruction: major advantages and potential
caveats of different surgical techniques
Click here to view
In the nasal ala, given the paucity of surrounding skin and the
importance of minimising nasal ala distortion, flaps that recruit skin
from a distant site should be considered. Mastering different
techniques is essential for a surgeon to optimise treatment for each
patient. At the end of the day, the best choice depends on many
factors and should be adapted on a case-by-case basis and to the
surgeon's expertise.
--
Alexandros Sfakianakis
Anapafseos 5 . Agios Nikolaos
Crete.Greece.72100
2841026182
6948891480
alsfakia@gmail.com
