Results of Fertility‐Sparing Surgery for Expansile and Infiltrative Mucinous Ovarian Cancers

AbstractBackground.No series had been reported focusing on the results of fertility‐sparing surgery in stage I mucinous ovarian cancers according to histotype (infiltrative vs. expansile). Investigating such outcomes was the aim of the present study.Materials and Methods.The present study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated conservatively with preservation of the uterus and contralateral ovary from 1976 to 2016. The pathology of the tumors was reviewed by two expert pathologists according to the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria. Oncologic and fertility results were analyzed.Results.Twenty‐one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, twelve with expansile and nine with infiltrative cancer. All patients had a unilateral tumor and underwent unilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy in one‐step (n = 6) or two‐step (n = 15) surgeries. All but one had complete peritoneal staging surgery based on cytology, omentectomy, and random peritoneal biopsies. Ten had nodal staging surgery. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages were IA (n = 9), IC1 (n = 6), and IC2 (n = 6); the nuclear grades were grade 1 (n = 9), grade 2 (n = 5), and grade 3 (n = 1). Two patients recurred (one expansile and one infiltrative type) 19 and 160 months after surgery, respectively. One stage IA, nuclear grade 2 expansile tumor recurred on the spared ovary; the patient remains alive. The other stage IA infiltrative tumor recurred as peritoneal spread; the patient is alive with disease. Six patients became pregnant; four with expansile tumors and two with infiltrative tumors.Conclusion.The type of mucinous cancer has no impact on the oncologic outcome in this series of patients treated conservatively. Fertility‐sparing surgery should be considered for early‐stage infiltrative‐type tumors.Implications for Practice.According to the most recently updated World Health Organization classification guidelines, mucinous cancers should be classified as either expansile or infiltrative. The infiltrative type has a poorer prognosis, but there are no data about the safety of fertility‐sparing surgery (FSS) in this context. A collection of 21 cases reviewed by two expert pathologists this study is the first devoted to the conservative treatment of mucinous tumors according to both subtypes. The key result was that the type of mucinous cancer has no impact on the oncologic outcome; thus, FSS may be considered in both subtypes.

from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2HnGFCZ