The effect of prior knowledge and intelligibility on the cortical entrainment response to speech

It has been suggested that cortical entrainment plays an important role in speech perception by helping to parse the acoustic stimulus into discrete linguistic units (Giraud & Poeppel, 2012). However, the question of whether the entrainment response to speech depends on the intelligibility of the stimulus remains open. Studies addressing this question of intelligibility have, for the most part, significantly distorted the acoustic properties of the stimulus to degrade the intelligibility of the speech stimulus, making it difficult to compare across "intelligible" and "unintelligible" conditions. To avoid these acoustic confounds, we follow Millman et al. (2015) and use priming to manipulate the intelligibility of vocoded speech. We use EEG to measure the entrainment response to vocoded target sentences that are preceded by natural-speech (non-vocoded) prime sentences that are either valid (match the target) or invalid (do not match the target). For unintelligible speech, valid primes have the effect of restoring intelligibility (Remez et al., 1980). We compared the effect of priming on the entrainment response for both 3-channel (unintelligible) and 16-channel (intelligible) speech (Loizou et al., 1999). We observed a main effect of priming, suggesting that the entrainment response depends on prior knowledge, but not a main effect of vocoding (16-channel vs. 3-channel). Furthermore, we found no difference in the effect of priming on the entrainment response to 3-channel and 16-channel vocoded speech, suggesting that for vocoded speech entrainment response does not depend on intelligibility.

from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2xcmoz9