Tests of the sorption and olfactory 'fovea' hypotheses in the mouse.

The spatial distribution of receptors within sensory epithelia (e.g. retina and skin) is often markedly non-uniform to gain efficiency in information capture and neural processing. By contrast, odors, unlike visual and tactile stimuli, have no obvious spatial dimension. What need then could there be for either nearest-neighbor relationships or non-uniform distributions of receptor cells in the olfactory epithelium (OE)? Adrian (1942; 1950) provided the only widely debated answer to this question when he posited that the physical properties of odors, such as volatility and water solubility, determine a spatial pattern of stimulation across the OE that could aid odor discrimination. Unfortunately, despite its longevity, few critical tests of the 'sorption hypothesis' exist. Here we test the predictions of this hypothesis by mapping mouse OE responses using the electroolfactogram (EOG) and comparing these response 'maps' to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of airflow and odorant sorption patterns in the nasal cavity. CFD simulations were performed for airflow rates corresponding to quiet breathing and sniffing. Consistent with predictions of the sorption hypothesis, water soluble odorants tended to evoke larger EOG responses in the central portion of the OE than the peripheral portion. However, sorption simulation patterns along individual nasal turbinates for particular odorants did not correlate with their EOG response gradients. Indeed, the most consistent finding was a rostral-greater to caudal-lesser response gradient for all the odorants tested that is un explained by sorption patterns. The viability of the sorption and related olfactory 'fovea' hypotheses are discussed in light of these findings.

from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2xciiar