Abstract
Objectives
To investigate diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in detecting maxillary sinus floor septa by means of a multi-observer receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and a standardized protocol for reporting (STARD protocol; Clin Chem 49(1):1–6, 2003).
Material and methods
From our database, 25 cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) were selected with one maxillary sinus floor septum (height ≥ 2.5 mm). For the same patient, a recent panoramic radiograph (PAN) had to be available in the database. As controls, 28 CBCTs plus corresponding PANs without evidence of a sinus septum were selected. Using the CBCTs as ground truth, 17 observers from our dental school on a five-point confidence scale rated both sinuses in all 53 PANs with respect to presence/absence of a sinus septum. Areas beneath ROC curves (Az-values), sensitivity/specificity (SNT/SPF), positive/negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR−) were computed for each observer and pooled over all observers. Inter-rater reproducibility was assessed by means of the intraclass coefficient (ICC) using a two-way random effects model.
Results
A pooled Az-value of 0.839 was observed (SNT 84.6%, SPF 73.5%). PPV ranged between 0.492 and 0.824 (median 0.627) and NPV between 0.838 and 0.976 (median 0.917). A median LR+ of 3.567 was computed (LR− median 0.193). Inter-rater reliability revealed an ICC of 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.62).
Conclusions
Our results indicate that PAN is a moderately accurate method for sinus elevation planning for the purpose of septum detection. Ruling out a septum by PAN seems to work more accurately than ruling in.
Clinical relevance
For the purpose of maxillary sinus floor septa detection, panoramic radiography can be relatively safely advocated, particularly for judgment of a septum-free sinus.
from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2FsTW0M
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου