Indirect vs direct assessment of gastric emptying: A randomized crossover trial comparing C-isotope breath analysis and MRI

Abstract

Background

Indirect methods to assess gastric emptying (GE), such as ¹³C breath tests (BT), are commonly used. However, BT usually use a sampling time of 4+ hours. The current study aims to assess the validity of BT for four liquid meals differing in physicochemical properties. To this aim, we compared them to MRI GE-measurements.

Methods

Fifteen healthy males (age 22.6 ± 2.4 years, BMI 22.6 ± 1.8 kg/m²) participated in a randomized 2 × 2 crossover experiment. Test foods were liquid meals, which were either thin/thick and 100/500 kcal, labeled with 100 mg of ¹³C-octanoate. GE was measured with MRI and assessed by ¹³C recovery from breath. Participants were scanned every 10 minutes and at six time points breath samples were collected up to t = 90 minutes. Two curves were fitted to the data to estimate emptying halftime (t_{50 Ghoos} and t_{50 Bluck}). T₅₀ times were ranked per participant and compared between methods.

Key Results

On average, MRI and BT showed similar t₅₀ rankings for the four liquid meals. In comparison to MRI, t_{50 Ghoos} overestimated, while t_{50 Bluck} underestimated GE time_. Moreover, more viscous foods were overestimated. In most participants individual t₅₀ time rankings differed significantly between methods.

Conclusions & Inferences

BT can assess relative emptying differences on group level and collecting breath data for 90 minutes constitutes a lower burden for participants and the research facility. However, BT has severe shortcomings compared to MRI for individual GE assessment. Notably, food matrix effects should be considered when interpreting the results of BT.

Our aim was to assess similarity in assessment of gastric emptying between 90-min 13C breath analysis and MRI among four liquid meals. On group level both measurement methods show similar order of emptying times, however, both t50 times and rankings within a participant differed significantly between methods.

from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2EMAEmF