Dosimetric differences in flattened and flattening filter-free beam treatment plans.

Dosimetric differences in flattened and flattening filter-free beam treatment plans.

J Med Phys. 2016 Apr-Jun;41(2):92-9

Authors: Yan Y, Yadav P, Bassetti M, Du K, Saenz D, Harari P, Paliwal BR

Abstract
This study investigated the dosimetric differences in treatment plans from flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams from the TrueBeam System. A total of 104 treatment plans with static (sliding window) intensity-modulated radiotherapy beams and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beams were generated for 15 patients involving three cancer sites. In general, the FFF beam provides similar target coverage as the flattened beam with improved dose sparing to organ-at-risk (OAR). Among all three cancer sites, the head and neck showed more important differences between the flattened beam and FFF beam. The maximum reduction of the FFF beam in the mean dose reached up to 2.82 Gy for larynx in head and neck case. Compared to the 6 MV flattened beam, the 10 MV FFF beam provided improved dose sparing to certain OARs, especially for VMAT cases. Thus, 10 MV FFF beam could be used to improve the treatment plan.

PMID: 27217620 [PubMed]

from #ENT-PubMed via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1NM8rey
via IFTTT