Endovascular Repair of Acute Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Publication date: Available online 12 December 2017
Source:European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Author(s): Chiara Mascoli, Massimo Vezzosi, Andreas Koutsoumpelis, Mauro Iafrancesco, Aaron Ranasinghe, Paul Clift, Jorge Mascaro, Martin Claridge, Donald J. Adam
ObjectivesThe outcome of endovascular repair (EVAR) for acute TAAA is reported and the applicability of the t-Branch off the shelf (OTS) device is determined.MethodsInterrogation of a prospectively maintained database identified all patients who underwent EVAR for acute TAAA between September 2012 (when the first non-elective t-Branch case was performed) and November 2015. Early and medium-term outcomes were analysed. Survival and re-intervention-free survival were calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsA total of 39 patients (27 men; mean ± SD age, 72 ± 8 years) were treated for acute symptomatic (n = 29) or ruptured (n = 10) TAAA (20 anatomical extent I–III, 19 extent IV). Fourteen patients had mycotic aneurysms. The mean aneurysm diameter was 80 ± 20 mm. The mean ± SD follow-up was 21.4 ± 15.4 months. Surgeon modified fenestrated EVAR was used in 24 patients, chimney/periscope EVAR in two, and t-Branch in 13 (33%) patients. Aortic coverage was greater than 40 mm above the coeliac axis in all patients. A total of 127 target vessels (TVs) were preserved (mean 3.3 per patient) and two occluded within 30 days. The 30 day mortality was 26%. Four (10%) patients developed spinal cord ischaemia (SCI): two with paraplegia died within 30 days, and two with paraparesis recovered completely with blood pressure manipulation and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Estimated overall survival (±SD) at 12 and 24 months was 71.8 ± 7.2% and 63.2 ± 7.9%, respectively. Estimated freedom from re-intervention at 12 and 24 months was 93 ± 4.8% and 85.3 ± 6.8%, respectively.ConclusionsEVAR for acute TAAA is associated with acceptable early and mid-term results in patients who have no other treatment options. Only one third of these patients were suitable for the t-Branch device, indicating that further advances in device design are required to treat the majority of acute TAAA patients with commercially available OTS technology.



from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AzuAvL