Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 89
Author(s): S. Di Cosimo, C. Campbell, H.A. Azim, G. Galli, G. Bregni, G. Curigliano, C. Criscitiello, M. Izquierdo, L. de la Pena, D. Fumagalli, L. Fein, J. Vinholes, W.M.J. Ng, M. Colleoni, A. Ferro, B.J. Naume, A. Patel, J. Huober, M.J. Piccart-Gebhart, J. Baselga, E. de Azambuja
AimTo determine the value of mammography and breast ultrasound (US) in predicting outcomes in HER2 positive breast cancer patients (pts) within Neo-ALTTO trial.Patients and methodsMammography and US were required at baseline, week 6 and surgery. Two independent blinded investigators reviewed the measurements and assigned the corresponding response category. Pts showing complete or partial response according to RECIST (v1.1) were classified as responders. The association between imaging response at week 6 or prior to surgery was evaluated with respect to pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free Survival (EFS).ResultsOf the 455 pts enrolled in the trial, 267 (61%) and 340 (77%) had evaluable mammography and US at week 6; 248 (56%) and 309 (70%) pts had evaluable mammography and US prior to surgery. At week 6, 32% and 43% of pts were classified as responders by mammography and US, respectively. pCR rates were twice as high for responders than non-responders (week 6: 46% versus 23% by US, p < 0.0001; 41% versus 24% by mammography, p = 0.007). Positive and negative predictive values of mammography and US prior to surgery were 37% and 35%, and 82% and 70%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between response by mammography and/or US at week 6/surgery and EFS.ConclusionsMammography and US were underused in Neo-ALTTO although US had the potential to assess early response whereas mammography to detect residual disease prior to surgery. Our data still emphasise the need for further imaging studies on pts treated with neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy.
from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2BkyfNU
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου