Intraoperative direct cortical stimulation motor evoked potentials: Stimulus parameter recommendations based on rheobase and chronaxie

Publication date: November 2017
Source:Clinical Neurophysiology, Volume 128, Issue 11
Author(s): Tariq M. Abalkhail, David B. MacDonald, Ibrahim AlThubaiti, Faisal A. AlOtaibi, Bent Stigsby, Amal A. Mokeem, Iftetah A. AlHamoud, Maher I. Hassounah, Salah M. Baz, Abdulaziz AlSemari, Hesham M. AlDhalaan, Sameena Khan
ObjectiveTo determine optimal interstimulus interval (ISI) and pulse duration (D) for direct cortical stimulation (DCS) motor evoked potentials (MEPs) based on rheobase and chronaxie derived with two techniques.MethodsIn 20 patients under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, 5-pulse DCS thenar MEP rheobase and chronaxie with 2, 3, 4 and 5ms ISI were measured by linear regression of five charge thresholds at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1msD, and estimated from two charge thresholds at 0.1 and 1msD using simple arithmetic. Optimal parameters were defined by minimum threshold energy: the ISI with lowest rheobase2×chronaxie, and D at its chronaxie. Near-optimal was defined as threshold energy <25% above minimum.ResultsThe optimal ISI was 3 or 4 (n=7 each), 2 (n=4), or 5ms (n=2), but only 4ms was always either optimal or near-optimal. The optimal D was ∼0.2 (n=12), ∼0.1 (n=7) or ∼0.3ms (n=1). Two-point estimates closely approximated five-point measurements.ConclusionsOptimal ISI/D varies, with 4ms/0.2ms being most consistently optimal or near-optimal. Two-point estimation is sufficiently accurate.SignificanceThe results endorse 4ms ISI and 0.2msD for general use. Two-point estimation could enable quick individual optimization.



from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2wVcXAD