Source:Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Volume 296
Author(s): Adam D. Goodworth, Robert J. Peterka
BackgroundPosture control models are instrumental to interpret experimental data and test hypotheses. However, as models have increased in complexity to include multi-segmental dynamics, discrepancy has arisen amongst researchers regarding the accuracy and limitations of identifying neural control parameters using a single stimulus.New methodThe current study examines this topic using simulations with a parameterized model-fit approach. We first determine if the model-fit approach can identify parameters in the theoretical situation with no noise. Then, we measure variability and bias of parameter estimates when realistic noise is included. We also address how the accuracy is influenced by the frequency bandwidth of the stimulus, signal-to-noise of the data, and fitting procedures.ResultsWe found perfect identification of parameters in the theoretical model without noise. With realistic noise, bias errors were 4.4% and 7.6% for fits that included frequencies 0.02–1.2 Hz and 0.02–0.4 Hz, respectively. Fits between 0.02–1.2 Hz also had the lowest variability in parameter estimates compared to other bandwidths. Parameters with the lowest variability tended to have the largest influence on body sways. Results also demonstrated the importance of closely examining model fits because of limitations in fitting algorithms.Comparison with existing methodThe single-input model-fit approach may be a simpler and more practical method for identifying neural control mechanisms compared to a multi-stimulus alternative.ConclusionsThis study provides timely theoretical and practical considerations applicable to the design and analysis of experiments contributing to the identification of mechanisms underlying stance control of a multi-segment body.
from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2EDH0km
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου