Source:Brain Stimulation
Author(s): P. Rebelo, A.L. Green, T.Z. Aziz, A. Kent, D. Schafer, L. Venkatesan, B. Cheeran
BackgroundDirectional Deep Brain Stimulation (D-DBS) allows axially asymmetric electrical field shaping, away from structures causing side-effects. However, concerns regarding the impact on device lifespan and complexity of the monopolar survey have contributed to sparing use of these features.ObjectiveTo investigate whether chronically implanted D-DBS systems can improve the therapeutic window, without a negative impact on device lifespan, in thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS).MethodsWe evaluated stable outcomes of initial programming sessions (4–6 weeks post-implantation) retrospectively in 8 patients with drug-resistant disabling tremor syndromes. We assessed the impact of directional stimulation on the Therapeutic Window (TW), Therapeutic Current Strength (TCS), tremor scores, disability scores and total electrical energy delivered. Finally, we performed Volume of Tissue Activation (VTA) modelling, based on a range of parameters.ResultsWe report significant gains in TW (91%) and reductions in TCS (31%) with stimulation in the best direction compared to best omnidirectional stimulation alternative. Tremor and ADL scores improvements remained unchanged at six months. There was no increase in averaged IPG power consumption (there is a 6% reduction over the omnidirectional-only alternative). Illustrative VTA modelling shows that D-DBS achieves 85% of the total activation volume at just 69% of the stimulation amplitude of non-directional configuration.Conclusions: D-DBS can improve the therapeutic window over non-directional DBS, leading to significant reduction in disability that may be sustained without additional reprogramming visits. Device lifespan was not negatively impacted by the use of directional stimulation this study due to the programming approach.
from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2m7AUkB
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου