Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of traditional two-dimensional planning (2DP) and three-dimensional surgical simulation (3DS) in the surgical correction of skeletal class III with facial asymmetry. This retrospective cohort study included 37 consecutive adult Taiwanese patients. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional cephalometric measurements were obtained from cone beam computed tomography scans. The outcome variables were the differences in preoperative and postoperative linear and angular measurements and the differences between the two groups after surgery.

from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2pPtvbs